Saturday, April 15, 2017

A New Science-Art Solution to the Global Information and Communications Epidemic

The ethical evolutionary growth and development of the human condition is extremely complex. The task of advancing human evolution involves the recognition of past scientific mistakes and acting accordingly. Modern science has classified itself as an incurable carcinogenic state leading to certain extinction and that is not ethical. Ancient Greek science on the other hand, knew of the extinction of life forms from fossil evidence and invented an atomic science, specifically so that civilization would not become extinct. During the 3rd century BC, Plato's Academy actually called it the Science for ethical ends. At the Epicurean University the ethical atomic first principle logic applied to the movement of the moon influencing the female cycle by resonating with the atoms associated with female fertility. This resonance was held to explain a mother's love and compassion for children and belonged to the Science of universal love. Its teachers were called Saviours, saving civilization from the destructive properties of unformed matter of chaos emerging from the atom, as envisaged by Plato and Philo.
The search for first principle logic, in particular concerning the real nature of carcinogenic growth and development, is of paramount importance. Under these circumstances the recognition of scientific mistakes requires an exacting reexamining of ancient science itself. While associated intuitive religious beliefs are very relevant, it can be considered to be demeaning to leave them tied up in knots of unfathomable complexity rather than to obtain a more astute understanding of our commitment to them.
Scientific geniuses representing age old scientific thinking, related to the destructive property of unformed matter (nuclear detonation) emerging from within the atom to destroy civilization, existed. They included Plato; the father of ethical scientific research in the Western World, Philo; who linked Greek science to Hebrew culture, and Al-Haytham; the Islamic father of optics. Isaac Newton, a devout Christian, published that the ancient Greek first cause principle logic explained gravitational force correctly. He argued that it was a pretensious mistake to hold that the mass of objects in space caused gravity (see Newton's 28th Query Discussions). Plato, Philo and Al-Haytham stated that by developing a science based upon the concept of all knowledge being derived from the senses, in particular from vision, would cause the destructive property of unformed matter to emerge from within the atom to destroy civilization.
The general global religious reluctance to research such profound fundamental scientific mistakes is preventing information and communication research into advancing human civilization in an ethical, non-carcinogenic direction. The consequence of this is the global epidemic, concerning the contagious effects of scientific dysfunctional communication and information.
It is rapidly becoming common knowledge that American medical epidemiologists, appointed by the Government of the United States of America to protect the health and wellbeing of communities, have identified an uncontrollable virus-like dysfunctional 3D global epidemic. Scholars have published that is is an emotional control epidemic, transmitted though the mass production of information and communication devices. They have acknowledged that in order to the carry out their epidemiology responsibilities, the best that can be done is to try and mitigate the damage that the virus-like epidemic is causing.
The strain of the current global information and communication 3D epidemic echoes the form of the mathematical intent programmed within poker machines to bring about bankruptcy if continually played. Scientists are now afflicted with a heroin-like addiction, leading to both moral and financial bankruptcy, and have become obsessively committed to continually play the global corporate profit game, which is their proud badge of dysfunctional excellence. This unfortunate situation can be remedied if their brilliant research is synergized with new living information logic.
The inability of scientists to program a computer to generate appropriate human survival simulations in order to solve real evolutionary problems is particularly exasperating. In 1979, China's most highly awarded scientist, Hun Huang, educated in Scotland, provided Australian cancer researchers with the methodology to program a computer to generate 50 million years of healthy seashell evolution through space-time. Mainstream mathematics, lacking first principle logic, could only generate deformed or carcinogenic futuristic life-form simulations. The use of first principle mathematics to generate optimum growth and development representing the existence of a life-force, was proven. The simulations exactly matched fossilized mathematical seashell evolutionary growth and development. Likewise, the fossil record of humanoid sphenoid bone evolution exists to allow an identical methodology to obtain a human survival blueprint rather than a seashell one. Even if we remain locked into the present extinction mindset, such blueprint evidence would buy us precious time to harmonize mechanistic science with living scientific logic. Therefore, providing antidote knowledge regarding the present dysfunctional 3D epidemic, is a crucial issue.
The Australian team's discovery was published by Italy's leading science journal, Il Nuovo Cimento. In 1990 the world's leading technological research institute, IEEE, reprinted it as an important discovery, listed alongside such names as Louis Pasteur and Sir Francis Crick. The existing carcinogenic mindset sentences all life to extinction instead of allowing it to evolve toward infinity. Therefore, it follows that an examination of our incomplete science, to locate crucial first principle laws governing the human evolution of living information and communication, is warranted.
Politicians can presently only react to the reality of problems by acting upon their emotional responses to scientific advice given to them based upon the dysfunctional 3D communication and information epidemic. Scientists, technologists and politicians are at present emotionally denied the will to enter relevant human survival data into a computer program to generate realistic solutions. The scientist, Kun Huang, fully realized this situation when he provided the Australian researchers with the methodology to obtain an alternative line of reasoning to help bring about a balanced scientific mindset.
We know from released data belonging to the Manhattan Project that ancient geometrical logic was astute enough to intuit the existence of nuclear destructive chaos. A moral argument existed relevant to the making of the atomic bomb before Nazi Germany did. However, nobody thought about creating the omni-technology obviously associated with the ancient ethical human survival science. Logical reasoning at that time meant that the scientific information and communication needed to win the Second World War had to cause more entropic chaos than that of the enemy. As a result, global information and communication technology is about irresponsible and short sighted corporate profit in the form of a dysfunctional global epidemic.
Da Vinci, Descartes, Sir Francic Bacon and Einstein were certainly happy to give human vision a major role in the evolution of science's understanding of reality and this became the basis of a mechanistic science devoid of first principle living logic. When the sperm and egg unite to create human life the eye does not exist and therefore cannot be the seat of all knowledge. Therefore, modern science, by ignoring this fact, divorced itself from reasoning about the crucial first principle information associated with the evolutionary act of conception.
A high resolution picture of the geometrical shape of the human cell about to divide exists, showing that it is an infinite fractal expression of reality. Its geometrical electromagnetic shape does not allow the current 3D information epidemic to be transmitted to the new cell. That technological rejection obviously contains antidote information relating to the prevailing mechanistic epidemic bought about by the influx of dysfunctional communication and information devices. The epidemiologists are becoming aware that the transfer of living information during cell division does not obey our present understanding of information and communication.
The philosopher of ethical science, Immanuel Kant, who laid down the foundation of the electromagnetic Golden Age of Danish Science, considered that the first principle logic for ethical evolution was an "asymmetrical electromagnetic" inner vision within the creative artistic mind. As a deeply religious person he referred to it as it God's ethical purpose for perpetual peace on earth. As mentioned in the beginning of this article, intuitive religious beliefs are relevant and it can be considered to be demeaning to leave them tied up in knots of unfathomable complexity. Kant's asymmetrical electromagnetic inner vision viewing glasses actually came into existence in 2003, allowing us to make Salvado Dali's intuitive stereoscopic evolutionary artistic theories, visible for the first time to the general public.
Modern quantum biology cancer research has noted that healthy information flows in the opposite direction to the energies of entropic chaos, apparently entangling with it to evolve universal consciousness. Within his book, Utopia or Oblivion, Buckminster Fuller presumed that the merging of mechanical science with humanitarian science would be achieved through a new human survival artistic perspective. Using asymmetrical electromagnetic 3D glasses to view copies of paintings over the centuries, it can be observed that during the 21st Century artists have begun to unconsciously paint very dramatic 3D images into their work. This naturally occurring evolutionary intuitive ability contrasts with the artificial 3D virus-like epidemic proliferated by the mass production of dysfunctional communication and information devices. The flow of Kantian healthy ethical information flowing in the opposite direction to the dysfunctional virus is a mirror image of it. That is pertinent to the discarded 19th Century linguistic colour perception theories belonging to the English Prime Minister, William Gladstone and the philosopher of Science, Wolfgang von Goethe during the Great Darwinian Debate.
The Architect and Coordinator of QUAGI-Quantum Art Group International, the artist Roberto Denti, in collaboration with prize-winning quantum biologists helped to fuse the Australian Science-Art discoveries into Italian quantum biology's concept of the 21st Century Renaissance. Several international magazines recorded the birth-date of that Renaissance as being the 24th of September, 2010, when Denti's colleagues, Professor Massimo Pregnolato and Professor Paolo Manzelli, were awarded the Giorgio Napolitano Medal on behalf of the Republic of Italy, for their quantum biology research discoveries.
In 2012 the scientist Guy Deutscher's book of the year, Through the Language Glass, upgraded 19th Century linguistic colour perception theory into a new advanced neurological science. The work harmonized into the first principle cancer research theories of the Australian linguistic colour research and resonated with the research conducted by Roberto Denti and his colleagues. A unique coincidence had occurred. In 1988, the science writer for the Australian Medical Observer, Dr Calvin Miller, wrote a feature article for that eminent journal, based upon his investigation of the Australian first principle logic theories. He predicted that they might well become the basis of a New Renaissance. Roberto Denti and his artistic colleagues, expressed their Science-Art 21st Century Renaissance theories clearly in the new neurological language. It can now be observed that they were unconsciously painting in extremely vibrant 3D imagery, now relevant to locating an antidote to the artificial 3D science-art epidemic.
Massimo Pregnolato is one of the world's most highly awarded professors of medical chemistry. His research association with the artist Roberto Denti is recorded on the internet surrounded by paintings and coloured medical illustrations. When viewed through asymmetrical electromagnetic 3D glasses they depict vivid representations of Immanuel Kant and Emmanuel Levinas' inner artistic vision of futuristic ethical reality. In quantum biology cancer research this inner vision information flows in the opposite direction to the 3D information/communication epidemic bringing about heroin-like illusionary inner vision addictions related to an anticipation of poker machine-like financial gain.
The naturally occurring unconscious evolutionary development of inner stereoscopic vision is a visible demonstration of Salvador Dali's overwhelming intuition that his artwork contained a stereoscopic message of an advanced futuristic science. Dali's intuition dismissed Descartes' first principle "I think therefore I am" mathematical truism in favour of Sigmund Freud's first principle logic based upon the "joy of life". For those wanting to create and love children, Freud's first principle axiom could well read, "we desire and think, therefore we will be".
Pregnolato and Denti's proclamation of the substance upholding their 21st Century Renaissance resulted in two major world Art Quantum exhibitions involving internationally prestigious artists. The first exhibition is to be held at the Silber Gallery in Rome, from March 31 to 06 April 2016, and the second at Russia's famous Artists of Central Palace, Moscow, 22 to 28 April, 2016, as announced in the Spring Edition of Russian Art Week - Quantum Art Group Italia. Some of the artwork on exhibition is also represented by the world's largest commercial art gallery, Park West Gallery in Michigan, USA.
The crucial importance of this precursor to a new ethical 21st Century Renaissance science has been summarized by Roberto Denti: "The Art Quantum is a precursor of cognitive change to look for new inspirations, new reference models based on overcoming the limitations of the old mechanical ideas, thus generating anticipatory and innovative action of 'scientific and technological imagination, capable, factually capable of encouraging more useful interpretations of life and its evolution".
This article has been written as a possible contribution to obtaining the antidote to the 3D global information and communication epidemic. It seeks to help establish a source of corporate ethical stamps of approval for future first principle cancer research posters, depicting the past scientific mistakes mentioned herein. Establishing such a delicate but essential corporate synergistic understanding about futuristic technology is considered to be more effective in the manner of Dali's eccentric, colorful, unsophisticated methodology. The seals on the proposed posters containing an intent to consider ethical peacemaking initiatives based upon radical scientific shakeups are considered able to promote more trustworthy inclinations to try and solve the epidemic problem that are seen as being critical to the entropic status quo.
Professor Robert Pope is the Director of the Science-Art Research Centre of Australia, Uki, NSW, Australia. The Center's objective is to initiate a second Renaissance in science and art, so that the current science will be balanced by a more creative and feminine science. More information is available at the Science-Art Centre website: http://www.science-art.com.au/books.html
Professor Robert Pope is a recipient of the 2009 Gold Medal Laureate for Philosophy of Science, Telesio Galilei Academy of Science, London. He is an Ambassador for the Florentine New Measurement of Humanity Project, University of Florence, is listed in Marquis Who's Who of the World as an Artist-philosopher, and has received a Decree of Recognition from the American Council of the United Nations University Millennium Project, Australasian Node.
As a professional artist, he has held numerous university artist-in-residencies, including Adelaide University, University of Sydney, the Dorothy Knox Fellowship for Distinguished Persons and a residency at Yangzhou University, China. His artwork has been featured of the front covers of the art encyclopedia, Artists and Galleries of Australia, Scientific Australian and the Australian Foreign Affairs Record. His artwork can be viewed on the Science-Art Centre's website and the Park West Gallery website. The work of the Science-Art Research Centre is currently being presented at eminent art galleries in Rome and Moscow, and at the Centre's art gallery in Northern New South Wales, Australia.


Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/9359988

Understanding Science - Its Application in Daily Life

Science is derived from the Latin term 'scientia', which means 'knowledge.' It is a systematic explanation of every element present in the universe. To understand the subject, you simply have to look around you. Everything you see, whether it is your computer screen, a pen, papers, your pet, the sun, or other things are all elements of science. Science covers everything from the smallest particle in an atom present in the circuits of your computer, to the complicated electrical fluctuations and chemical interactions within our bodies that enable us to read and perform other normal activities.
The Characteristics of Science
Science helps in answering questions in a simple and logical manner. It can also lead to advancements in technology, and help us improve our knowledge on enormously useful and important topics, like the environment, natural hazards, our health, and others. Science is the reason for the developments in the modern world, and scientists across the world continue to work, to unravel the mysteries of the universe. A multi-faceted and complex subject, science has fairly straightforward basic characteristics.
Science limits its focus to the natural world, avoiding supernatural explanation about any given matter. It educates us about the natural world, what it is made of, what it contains, and how it works. It is more than a collection of factual data, and science is a long road to understanding the universe. It identifies answers by carrying out tests rather than speculating results. Observations and ideas form an integral part of science. Scientific ideas are accepted because they go through rigorous testing processes, but the emergence of new perspectives and evidences make these ideas subject to revisions.
Fields and Branches of Science
Science is commonly classified under two major categories: Social sciences (study of societies and human behavior), and natural sciences (study of natural phenomena such as biological life). Other disciplines in the subject include applied and interdisciplinary sciences, such as medicine and engineering. Although these scientific disciplines have their own expertise and nomenclature, they often include other inter-related disciplines.
Formal science is another branch of the subject, which includes mathematics, logic, and statistics. Formal sciences are crucial in the formulation of laws, hypotheses, and theories related to social sciences (the manner in which humans or animals think or act), and natural sciences (the explanation about how everything works). Each discipline of science has sub-divisions that focus on particular sections of the subject.
Why Study It?
Science offers wide scope for people who are interested in exploring the mysteries of the universe. Getting science help will ensure that you better understand the natural world and how it works. A good science tutor is greatly beneficial for students who find the study of science difficult.
Lance Merlino is an expert Science Tutor [http://www.mathssuccess.co.za/science-tutor/] with Maths Success and has a long list of science help [http://www.mathssuccess.co.za/science-help/] success stories of science students.


Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/7703156

High Technology and Human Development

Some basic premises - often fashioned by leaders and supported by the led - exercise the collective conscience of the led in so far as they stimulate a willed development. The development is usually superior but not necessarily civilized. The premises in question are of this form: "Our level of technological advancement is second to none. Upon reaching this level, we also have to prepare our society for peace, and to guarantee the peace, technology must be revised to foster the policy of war." Technological advancement that is pushed in this direction sets a dangerous precedent for other societies that fear a threat to their respective sovereignties. They are pushed to also foster a war technology.
In the domain of civilization, this mode of development is not praiseworthy, nor is it morally justifiable. Since it is not morally justifiable, it is socially irresponsible. An inspection of the premises will reveal that it is the last one that poses a problem. The last premise is the conclusion of two preceding premises but is not in any way logically deduced. What it shows is a passionately deduced conclusion, and being so, it fails to be reckoned as a conclusion from a rationally prepared mind, at least at the time at which it was deduced.
A society that advances according to the above presuppositions - and especially according to the illogical conclusion - has transmitted the psyche of non-negotiable superiority to its people. All along, the power of passion dictates the pace of human conduct. Whether in constructive engagements or willed partnerships, the principle of equality fails to work precisely because of the superiority syndrome that grips the leader and the led. And a different society that refuses to share in the collective sensibilities or passion of such society has, by the expected logic, become a potential or actual enemy and faces confrontation on all possible fronts.
Most of what we learn about the present world, of course, via the media, is dominated by state-of-the-art technology. Societies that have the most of such technology are also, time and again, claimed to be the most advanced. It is not only their advancement that lifts them to the pinnacle of power, superiority, and fame. They can also use technology to simplify and move forward an understanding of life and nature in a different direction, a direction that tends to eliminate, as much as possible, a prior connection between life and nature that was, in many respects, mystical and unsafe. This last point does not necessarily mean that technological advancement is a mark of a superior civilization.
What we need to know is that civilization and technology are not conjugal terms. Civilized people may have an advanced technology or they may not have it. Civilization is not just a matter of science and technology or technical infrastructure, or, again, the marvel of buildings; it also has to do with the moral and mental reflexes of people as well as their level of social connectedness within their own society and beyond. It is from the general behaviour makeup of people that all forms of physical structures could be created, so too the question of science and technology. Thus, the kind of bridges, roads, buildings, heavy machinery, among others, that we can see in a society could tell, in a general way, the behavioural pattern of the people. Behavioural pattern could also tell a lot about the extent to which the natural environment has been utilized for infrastructural activities, science and technology. Above all, behavioural pattern could tell a lot about the perceptions and understanding of the people about other people.
I do believe - and, I think, most people do believe - that upon accelerating the rate of infrastructural activities and technology, the environment has to recede in its naturalness. Once advancing technology (and its attendant structures or ideas) competes with the green environment for space, this environment that houses trees, grass, flowers, all kinds of animals and fish has to shrink in size. Yet the growth of population, the relentless human craving for quality life, the need to control life without depending on the unpredictable condition of the natural environment prompt the use of technology. Technology need not pose unwarranted danger to the natural environment. It is the misuse of technology that is in question. While a society may justly utilize technology to improve quality of life, its people also have to ask: "how much technology do we need to safeguard the natural environment?" Suppose society Y blends the moderate use of technology with the natural environment in order to offset the reckless destruction of the latter, then this kind of positioning prompts the point that society Y is a lover of the principle of balance. From this principle, one can boldly conclude that society Y favours stability more than chaos, and has, therefore, the sense of moral and social responsibility. Any state-of-the-art technology points to the sophistication of the human mind, and it indicates that the natural environment has been cavalierly tamed.
If humans do not want to live at the mercy of the natural environment - which, of course, is an uncertain way of life - but according to their own predicted pace, then the use of technology is a matter of course. It would seem that the principle of balance that society Y has chosen could only be for a short while or that this is more of a make-believe position than a real one. For when the power of the human mind gratifies itself following a momentous achievement in technology, retreat, or, at best, a slow-down is quite unusual. It is as if the human mind is telling itself: "technological advancement has to accelerate without any obstruction. A retreat or a gradual process is an insult to the inquiring mind." This kind of thought process only points out the enigma of the mind, its dark side, not its finest area. And in seeking to interrogate the present mode of a certain technology according to the instructions of the mind, the role of ethics is indispensable.
Is it morally right to use this kind of technology for this kind of product? And is it morally right to use this kind of product? Both questions hint that the product or products in question are either harmful or not, environmentally friendly or not, or that they do not only cause harm directly to humans but directly to the environment too. And if, as I have stated, the purpose of technology is to improve the quality of life, then to use technology to produce products that harm both humans and the natural environment contradicts the purpose of technology, and it also falsifies an assertion that humans are rational. Furthermore, it suggests that the sophisticated level that the human mind has reached is unable to grasp the essence or rationale of quality life. In this regard, a peaceful coexistence with the natural environment would have been deserted for the sake of an unrestrained, inquiring human mind. The human mind would, as it were, become corrupted with beliefs or ideas that are untenable in any number of ways.
The advocacy that is done by environmentalists relate to the question of environmental degradation and its negative consequences on humans. They insist that there is no justification for producing high-tech products that harm both humans and the natural environment. This contention sounds persuasive. High technology may demonstrate the height of human accomplishment, but it may not point to moral and social responsibility. And to this point, the question may be asked: "In what ways can humans close the chasm between unrestrained high technology and environmental degradation?"
Too often, most modern humans tend to think that a sophisticated lifestyle is preferable to a simple one. The former is supported by the weight of high technology, the latter is mostly not. The former eases the burden of depending too much on the dictates of the natural environment, the latter does not. The latter tends to seek a symbiotic relationship with the natural environment, the former does not. Whether human comfort should come largely from an advanced technology or the natural environment is not a matter that could be easily answered. If the natural environment is shrinking due to population growth and other unavoidable causes, then advanced technology is required to alleviate the pressures to human comfort that arise. It is the irresponsible proliferation of, say, war technology, high-tech products, among others, that are in need of criticism and have to stop.
Mr. Ainsah-Mensah has worked in various capacities mostly in Canada and now in China. He is an education and race relations consultant, projects coordinator, writer, and post-secondary instructor in business courses, life skills, and critical thinking. He is currently the principal of Handan-Lilac Education Group in China.


Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/22761

Patents: A Tool for Technological Intelligence

Patents are the largest source of technological information. Patent are given to the inventor as a reward for its innovation in the form of the exclusive right of the monopoly for a period of 20 years from the priority date of the invention. Due to advancement in the IT sector and internet, now these valuable documents are in the reach of the general public. Any person skilled in the art can go through various patent databases and after a search can get the patent document of their need. There are different patent databases viz, USPTO, EPO, JPO, etc freely open for the public access. If we go through the patents related to a specific technological area, we will be able to find the lots of information about the life cycle of the technological innovation viz.,
o evolutionary path of a specific technology,
o technological development,
o technological diversification,
o technology merges,
o major players in specific technological area,
o key points of the specific technology,
"The World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO) revealed that 90% to 95% of all the world's inventions can be found in patented documents."
Patent analysis can reveals very valuable informations, which is not available anywhere. After patent search the crucial part is the patent analysis, and one have to be very concise about their objective of the study. The information in the patent documents can be utilized in different form according to the need and mapped accordingly to get the picture of the entire analysis in snapshots.
Patent data can be used for the preparation of technological landscapes. Logistic mathematics and circle mathematics can be very useful in the plotting of the technological landscape. It can reveal the evolutionary trend of a technology, how it is evolved from a basic technology, along with the period of the technological diversification and its nature. These maps will also give the detailed overview of the merging of the different technologies to give rise to break-through technologies. These types of maps will be very useful for the R&D personals to evaluate the position of their research and technology, and also they will find way to more innovate more advanced and valuable technology.
In the today's global context firms need to know what technologies can competitors choke easily, and may be attempting to. They also need to know the spaces in technologies where competition is intense, and the areas where competitors are concentrating their IP development and their R&D efforts. They need to be able to track patent acquisition and development strategies and chart out the competitive landscape. To evaluate technology before making any investment decision, firms need to know the pace of patenting activity in the technology, which patents embody fundamental ideas in the technology and how vulnerable the firm's technologies are to patent infringements. This will give them much needed information in deciding between technology development and technology acquisition.
The ability to extract relevant information from patent literature is a crucial success factor for anyone involved in technological innovation. The technology mapping technique's that can be used to transform patent information into knowledge that can influence decision-making.
Patents are an important source of technological intelligence that companies can use to gain strategic advantage. Technology Intelligence is a can be used for gathering, analyzing, forecasting, and managing external technology related information, including patent information. Computational patent mapping is a methodology for the development and application of a technology knowledgebase for technology and competitive intelligence. The primary deliverables of patent mapping is in the form of knowledge visualization through landscape and maps. These maps provide valuable intelligence on technology evolution/revolution, nature of various types of pioneering; big; pure; and emerging players, state-of-the-art assessment, etc.
These types of technological maps will prove to be a valuable multiplier in R&D and commercialization activities, in various ways including the following:
o Developing further insights in response to strategic requirements and policy formulation in the organization
o Forecasting and identifying technological activities and trends in the industry
o Aiding in the visualization of alternative development and growth paths available to the organization
o Enabling pre-emptive recognition and action on potential licensing opportunities
o Identifying prospective partners and clients
o Identify technology discontinuities and areas of opportunities in their chosen technologies
o Monitor and evaluate the technological process of competitors and potential competitors
o Support decisions on foray and investment into particular technologies and sub-technologies
o Surveillance of technological progress of competitors as well as to alert oneself to new entrants to the field
o Spotting of white spaces or opportunity areas within a dense technological domain
o Creative tool to simulate new ideas and create new IP
o Complementing corporate IP filing strategies
o Support technology proposals for large scale national and international level projects
o Support investment and technology due diligence on companies
Patent mapping can be an integral part of IP management. It can uncover valuable information hidden in patents and can provide useful indicators for technical trends, market trends, competitors changes and technological profile and innovation potential of a company. Patent maps are visual representations of patent information that has been mined and aggregated or clustered to highlight specific features. There is a high degree of flexibility in visualization, which may be in the form of time-series or as spatial maps. We provide a more market and technology oriented analysis of the complete set of patent portfolio assets via our patent mapping services. Patent mapping can be used to ascertain the quality of patents with respect to prevailing technology and the extent to which patents affect the technology. This is a valuable input in technology sourcing/development and R&D decisions. Patent mapping can be indispensable for both firms that have an under-utilized patent profile and are looking to license/assign it at the most favorable terms, as well as to firms that are looking at developing patent portfolio strength in a particular technological field.
Mere subject specialization is not enough for this, but analytical thinking and innovations are very essential. Today lots of software resources are available for mapping the patent data, but almost all are confined to bibliographic informations. The machine work cannot be compared with that of human intelligence. Patent mapping requires many skills. First and foremost among these is an ability to understand the complex scientific ideas protected by the patents themselves. Although it is possible to create a patent map by analyzing the relationships between patents without understanding the subject matter, such a map is often useless and needs to be refined by someone who understands the intricacies of the particular scientific discipline that is the basis of the invention. Thus, I expect that the need for people with scientific (and engineering) expertise in the field of patent mapping is on the increase. That's why today lots of KPO firm are looking for the right individual and there is a huge demand today, which will certainly increase in the near future.


Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/47680

How To Pay Or Finance Your Pharmacy School Education

You just got into pharmacy school and after jumping for joy after reading your acceptance letter, reality sets in and you may ask yourself: "How am I going to pay for pharmacy school?" Getting into pharmacy school was probably one of your greatest achievements you may have accomplished thus far. It is not easy passing biology, general chemistry, physics, calculus and the mother of all classes - Organic Chemistry 1 and 2. It probably has taken you 4, 5 and even 12 years to finish your bachelor's degree and get into pharmacy school. Now comes, the money issue. After all, pharmacy school is very costly. Knowing how to pay for pharmacy school is crucial and can determine if you are going to live in misery for the next 10 years after pharmacy school or live in luxury.
I want to make this a clear point. Declaring for bankruptcy may not wipe out your student loans. Make sure that you read the entire loan contract agreement when you decide to sign on the dotted line. Saying all this, most students will finance their pharmacy school education through 3 main ways.
#1) Rich Parents or Relatives - If you have rich parents and/or relatives, consider yourself lucky (or not). If they are willing to pay for your pharmacy school education, you have nothing to worry. You don't even have to read the rest of this article. You got in and your education is paid for. There is nothing else you need to do. Just enjoy your summer before starting back again in the fall semester.
#2) Scholarships - Most schools do offer scholarships to students based on a myriad of factors such as GPA, PCAT scores and extracurricular activities. Scholarships are very limited and difficult to get; however, where there is a will there will always be a way. Anything is possible and you should take as much time in completing the application just like as if you had to apply to pharmacy school all over again.
#3) Loans - This is probably the most common method in financing your pharmacy school education. I recommend that you read the fine print closely and make sure that you understand how repaying your loans going to work after you have graduated from pharmacy school. Also, keeping all of your important paperwork in one neat portfolio will help streamline the loan application process.
I hope that you have enjoyed reading this article.
Charlie Thai is a pharmacy student and author of the "How To Get Into Pharmacy School" Ebook. He can be reached by going to [http://www.GetIntoPharmacySchool.com]


Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/780644

Six Overlooked Benefits Of A Catholic School Education

Most parents would agree that getting an education is important. They want their children to have the best. For some parents, the best isn't limited only to what is learned out of a textbook. Catholic schools are known for teaching their students more than just the general subjects. The benefits these children walk away with offer a richer educational experience.
Arts, Drama, and Music Are Central
Most public education systems have limited budgets and many have cut the arts from their curriculum. Thankfully, students receiving a Catholic education still get to enjoy these subjects. Art, music and drama are all rooted in the rich history of the Church.
Excellence isn't Just Altruistic
Children enrolled in Catholic school learn that God wants them to put their best selves forward. They strive for excellence both in and out of the classroom is a direct response to God's blessings on them.
Civic Responsibility Is Everyone's Job
Civic activities aren't just for parents. In fact, these education systems help students to become more responsible too. Whether it's getting people to sign up to vote or volunteering, children learn to be civically minded. Studies indicated that children who received a private school education are more likely to participate in civic duties as adults because they were taught at a young age to engage in these activities.
Community Service is Valued
Along with civic duty, Catholic school children learn how to be of service to their community. Older students have to complete a certain number of service hours as part of their grade. They can pick up trash, read to the elderly, or help at a food bank. They can also do works of service around the school as payment for a good education. Younger students can do things such as food drives, clothing drives, or adopting a family who is less fortunate around Christmas time.
Discipline Is Expected
Having self-discipline is considered a moral quest based on the gospels. Kids are challenged to be Christ-like in their actions and words. This means they must behave in a way similar to how Christ would have handled the situation. Students are taught to analyzes their choices and base the consequences on how the scripture says they should.
Immersion of Faith
It is true not all catholic school students are Catholic. However, most students share similar religious beliefs. Students learn how the Paschal Mysteries plays a big part in their day-to-day lives by immersing themselves in the faith. It also helps them understand the need for community and their role in society.
To learn more about Catholic school life, Holmdel residents should visit http://www.sjvhs.com/index.aspx.


Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/9370755